I read a paper like this. I have two responses:
1. Like my children often say "what the ...". and
2. Why bother?
To me, this is classic, Type 1 knowledge.
I get to the end of the paper and all I can ask is: what was Kauffman trying to say?
That there are many different perspectives?
That most of them are valid?
That we often learn from one another?
I'm sure that if perhaps I was better educated, this might have more meaning for me. I'm sorry. I feel there are more important questions that should be the subject of inquiry.
Friday, March 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment